🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on recent research, the average family pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee making moderate income pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

For America, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' health histories for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.