🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed ruling, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to implement a newly configured congressional map that is projected to include as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to overturn a district court's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The district court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and disturbing the delicate balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its decision.

The federal court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters based on their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it passed the new maps. It had ordered the state to employ the maps established after the 2020 census for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

With a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She stated that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its decision was written by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas citizens, without justification, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a infraction of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

This decision is part of a nationwide battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican majority. Ordinarily, map-drawing happens after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, for their part, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas top lawyer hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order upheld Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

In contrast, Democratic officials criticized the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major Democratic election organization.

A leading House leader said the court had yet again shredded its credibility by approving a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.